Author Archives: Stephan

Story Structure and How Not To Write A Screenplay

John Yorke, Controller of BBC Drama Production, talks of ‘The Curse of the Screenwriting Gurus’ and how decades of ‘how to’ books have destroyed the serious study of structure. On the whole I’m prone to agree; like many I spend at least as much time reading about writing as I do actually writing. However, I’ve recently finished How Not To Write A Screenplay by Denny Martin Flinn, and I was very impressed with its no-nonsense approach. It was easily the best book on screenwriting I’ve read. And one of the topics covered was structure; essentially saying that there were different models.

Flinn essentially stated that there were a multitude of different models for the structure of stories. Which storytelling structural model you are comfortable with or is the best fit, is entirely up to the writer. And by no means are these structural models restricted to screenwriting; all storytelling benefits from structure, whether a novel, roleplaying scenario or an after-dinner anecdote. Here then are the models in question: Continue reading

Thanks for the taste

There’s nothing like the taste of success, no matter how small a morsel, to spur you onwards and encourage you not to give up. However, coming in the Top 25 of submissions to the London Film Festival / Script Angel mentoring competition is no small morsel. It’s no win, in fact I didn’t make the top 3, but it’s still a huge acknowledgment and a massive confidence boost. I am massively grateful.

Not only was it a successful outing for my pitch template, but it shows that while the first ten pages of my screenplay will need some polishing, the potential is there.

A huge thank you to those who have lent encouragement, ears and eyes.

Favourite Movie Dialogue – Batchelor Knight

Richard Nugent: Hey, you remind me of a man.
Susan Turner: What man?
Richard Nugent: Man with the power.
Susan Turner: What power?
Richard Nugent: Power of hoodoo.
Susan Turner: Hoodoo?
Richard Nugent: You do.
Susan Turner: Do what?
Richard Nugent: Remind me of a man…

From Batchelor Knight (AKA The Bachelor and the Bobby-Soxer) (1947)

As later popularly paraphrased in Labyrinth (1986)

On Reality

I think that, to a greater or lesser extent, writers have a tenuous grasp on reality. In fictional worlds we create situations, people and places, but tinged by our own perspectives and experiences. Even in non-fiction, the worldview we put forward is a constructed, edited one, addressed at an audience and free from many of the contradictions of our inner minds.

I bring this up because, on the few times I actually remember my dreams, the barriers between dreamworld and ‘reality’ become so blurred for me, that even on waking I’m still not sure whether I’m still asleep. I had such a dream last night. In a semi-awake state I wrote the following in my journal:

It’s not the first time I’ve had dreams indistinguishable from the real world, whether realistic nightmares of masked loved ones, or dreams of a full day of work. This also tallies with my love of films that question what reality is, whether it be The Matrix, Existenz or, most appropriately, Inception. I wonder if my love of these films is because of the dreams, whether the dreams are because of the films, or because both are a symptom of my post-modern suspicions about the so-called absolute and irrefutable nature of reality.

The nature of reality is something I come back to a lot. I write a lot of urban fantasy, a modern, recognisable world where beneath the comforting veneer of the familiar lies the horror of the unknown. I wrote a non-fiction piece called Parallel Words for a comics website and a somewhat niche spoken word piece called Plato’s Cave. Anything to try and make sense of the desert of the real.

We use the word ‘real’ as if it’s solid, reliable, its stability a comfort. Reality is terror enough for some people, without adding the complication that it might not be quite as comfortingly immutable as they convince themselves it is. Malleable reality, inter-layered interlocked personal paradigms, these are the ephemeral things of dreams and nightmares, where nothing can be relied upon.

I recently read, and loved, Michael Marshall Smith’s Only Forward (review soon!) in which the protagonist says the following:

People always find it so frustrating that there’s no structure they can see, that they just have to follow the river downstream and see what they find. They want to know the plot so they can guess the end, because they’re afraid of what it might be. I can understand that, even though I know it’s not the way things work. I never know what the hell’s going to happen next, but I can live with that.

As writers we craft our realities, overlapping with those of others from time to time; we show them our rivers and will them to follow them downstream. If we’ve done our jobs well, they won’t know what the hell’s going to happen next, and we hope they can take aspects of what we’ve created for them and integrate it into their own realities.

Finally, in summary, I leave you with some words of wisdom from John Constantine:

John Constantine on Reality

On Fear

“I must not fear. Fear is the mind-killer. Fear is the little-death that brings total obliteration. I will face my fear. I will permit it to pass over me and through me. And when it has gone past I will turn the inner eye to see its path. Where the fear has gone there will be nothing. Only I will remain.”

Frank Herbert, Dune

Anatomy of a Party

A bit of a departure from my regular posts this morning. Last weekend I threw a party for a friend, themed around a 1920′s Speak Easy; an opportunity for people to meet up, get dressed up and get a little bit messed up.

Obviously there were two important components to start with: A 1920′s Playlist on Spotify and a Cocktail Menu. One thing I learned a little too late about cocktails at parties: Make big jugs of cocktails, and limit the cocktails like the Old Fashioned that take ages to make properly and need to be made one at a time, unless you never want to leave the bar all night! Saying that though, the Old Fashioneds were delicious, so it might be hard to keep to that rule!

To get everyone in the spirit of things, I adapted the rules of the party game Mafia to the setting of a speak easy and came up Prohibition! Sadly we only got to play one round through, but in future I can always wheel out the Christmas-themed version I wrote!

After the end of the game, to accompany a lot more drinks and perhaps not enough food, it was time for a more generic party playlist, again on Spotify. This then kept us entertained until the musical butchery of late-night, drunken Rock Band ensued!

Guest Post: Romantics and replicants: Art and escapism with Jane Austen and Roy Batty

By Tim Atkinson

He was evidently a young man of considerable taste in reading, though principally in poetry.

Jane Austen on Captain Benwick, Persuasion

“I’ve seen things you people wouldn’t believe. [laughs] Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion. I watched c-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhäuser Gate. All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.”

Roy Batty, Blade Runner

Art saves. Escapism is a wonderful thing – make no bones about it. In the worlds we find in books and films, in our wordless absorption of art and music, we affirm our right to dream.

Dreams of hope, of consolation, of visions great and terrible, of futures possible and impossible.

Like many readers of fantasy and SF, you could say with Roy Batty that I’ve seen things you people wouldn’t believe: sorcerers’ apprentices duelling with magic for power and pride; giant sandworms with vacuum cleaner bodies rearing out of the Arrakeen desert; first contact with aliens with names from the minds of heterodox Scrabble players.

And I wouldn’t take any of it back.

But too much submersion in dreams can be perilous – ask any MMORPG addict. We have to live in the present at least some of the time; to cope with its demands, sure, but also to enjoy its sweetness, all those moments that would otherwise be lost in the rain.

None of this was news to Jane Austen, who wrote at a time when the Gothic, the fount of modern SF and fantasy writing, was in its ascendant. Ann Radcliffe (The Mysteries of Udolpho) had made her mark just before the turn of the century, and the Romantic poets – your Byrons, your Wordsworths, your Shelley’s M and P – were Regency people like Austen.

There was no shortage of people – in short – swooning at the poetry and literature of the sublime: art aspiring for a vertiginous awestruck feeling, dispensing delight and shivers in equal measure.

Of course, the thing about the epic and the overwrought are that they are great for inspiration, but not so great as a template for everyday living.

As a writer, but of practical temperament, who described herself as a painter of miniatures rather than of broad canvasses, I like to think that Austen understood both the appeal and the danger of too much emotional transport.

Hence Persuasion’s Captain Benway, one of a procession of unsuitable suitors in her books, but depicted much more sympathetically than Messrs Collins or Elton in Pride & Prejudice and Emma.

The good captain is a heartbroken navy man, mourning the death of his fiancée while he was at sea, when he encounters Anne Elliott, a typical Austenian protagonist of good sense and robust character.

Over dinner, she finds that they have literature in common, and out of a shared interest and a desire to bring him out of his funk stems a most interesting conversation.

having talked of poetry [...] and gone through a brief comparison of opinion as to the first-rate poets [...] he repeated, with such tremulous feeling, the various lines which imaged a broken heart, or a mind destroyed by wretchedness, and looked so entirely as if he meant to be understood, that she ventured to hope he did not always read only poetry, and to say that she thought it was the misfortune of poetry to be seldom safely enjoyed by those who enjoyed it completely ; and that the strong feelings which alone could estimate it truly were the very feelings which ought to taste it but sparingly.

Anne goes onto recommend Benway some improving reading – ‘such works of our best moralists, such collections of the finest letters, such memoirs of characters of worth and suffering’ – as she deems necessary to re-ground this sensitive soul in reality.

Indeed, Not too long after in Persuasion, he finds a more conducive outlet for his great-souled instincts in caring for Louisa, Anne’s rival in love, following her unfortunate accident. Happiness results, although one hopes that he still got to read some poetry.

So, the moral here is still art saves. But it’s meant to save you for the real world, not from it. The experience lived has primacy over the experience imagined.

A proposition to which both Jane Austen and Roy Batty would, I hope, agree.

Hemlock Grove, House of Cards and the Future of Digital TV Distribution

Hemlock Grove

After the success of Netflix’s re-imagining of the political drama House of Cards, a follow-up for the digital distribution model was inevitably quick to follow. This week saw the release of Hemlock Grove, Eli Roth’s take on urban fantasy TV, just with added Rothian gore. The first episode is a strangely paced affair with strange accents, overly emphasised meaningful glances and inconsistently signalled shifts in timeline. I’ll watch more, for now, but right now I’m more interested in the distribution model and what it means.

One curious decision is the attempt to break away from the TV-style schedule, which sees viewers waiting a week between episodes. Instead Netflix gives us the entire 13 episode ‘season’ in one go. It’s a curious decision because, while viewers enjoy being able to watch at a schedule determined by their inclinations and free time, it means that the buzz about the show is often over in short order. Instead of 13 weeks of excitement and live-tweeting and the free advertising that comes with it, it’s all over in a heartbeat. The ‘water cooler moment’, these days perhaps replaced by social media, is almost entirely absent.

Still, it’s a bold step into a new world that Netflix takes, and one followed closely by the competition.  Amazon-owned Lovefilm will pilot TV shows online, including a ‘TV’ adaptation of the movie Zombieland. Microsoft is also keen to get in on this game via their XBox entertainment distribution medium (they stopped being ‘mere’ gaming consoles a long time ago), and have said they intend to revive Heroes as an XBox TV show. Even the BBC intends to broadcast some programmes on iPlayer first, beginning with Doctor Who material.

A common factor with all these offerings is the fact that, as yet, this market isn’t mature enough for independent offerings; they are not a distribution medium for the indie filmmaker, who will have to stick to the barely monetised Youtube or Vimeo. House of Cards had Kevin Spacey and David Fincher attached; Hemlock Grove has Famke Janssen and Eli Roth; Zombieland, Heroes and Doctor Who are known franchises. The point of this exercise is to attract eyeballs and the wallets they’re associated with. An independent film or TV show with no big name attached to them won’t lure viewers from rival platforms.

That’s not to say that digital distribution of independent movies can’t succeed; my favourite such offering is Ink. It won Best International Feature at the Cancun Film Festival, but couldn’t get a distribution deal. Instead they sold the movie directly, distributed it on peer-to-peer networks and had it shown on Hulu and Netflix, eventually building to commercial success. But as yet this is an outlier, especially in the short term until the medium of digital TV and movie distribution matures. But, as eventually became the case for music, this is an inevitable and exciting journey. And one that, eventually, independent filmmakers will benefit from.

Update

Amazon’s LoveFilm have put the Zombieland pilot up to watch for free. It’s the same characters, but different actors. It has none of the charm or wit of the movie and it was actually a chore to watch. It was so bad that it actually elevates Hemlock Grove in comparison.

Flash Flood

I’ve not tended to have much success with submissions. Firstly, I had a habit of submitting old stories that I wrote years ago, hardly representative of where I am now as a writer. And secondly, I’ve never been very diligent in actually submitting stories to competitions or opportunities. Not sending anything is always going to get in the way of winning plaudits.

This week a friend suggested I enter a flash fiction competition at FlashFlood, an online flash-fiction journal. For once, rather than yet again repurposing old material, I threw together a new story in short order. After some helpful edits, I submitted it and… was accepted!

Needless to say I’m thrilled! Not just to have the story be accepted, but also for the generation of new material, a foundation upon which to build.

And the story itself? I’ve since re-titled it for future submissions, but I present to you: Death Penalty.